| Part of a series on |
| Economics |
|---|
 |
Applied economics is the application of economic theory and econometrics in specific settings. As one of the two sets of fields of economics (the other set being the core),[1] it is typically characterized by the application of the core, i.e. economic theory and econometrics to address practical issues in a range of fields including demographic economics, labour economics, business economics, industrial organization, agricultural economics, development economics, education economics, engineering economics, financial economics, health economics, monetary economics, public economics, and economic history. From the perspective of economic development, the purpose of applied economics is to enhance the quality of business practices and national policy making.[2]
The process often involves a reduction in the level of abstraction of this core theory. There are a variety of approaches including not only empirical estimation using econometrics, input-output analysis or simulations but also case studies, historical analogy and so-called common sense or the "vernacular".[3] This range of approaches is indicative of what Roger Backhouse and Jeff Biddle argue is the ambiguous nature of the concept of applied economics. It is a concept with multiple meanings.[4] Among broad methodological distinctions, one source places it in neither positive nor normative economics but the art of economics, glossed as "what most economists do".[5]
- ^ "American Economic Association".
- ^ "Applied Economics - Overview, Components, Importance". Corporate Finance Institute. Retrieved 2020-11-13.
- ^ Swann, G. M. P. (2006) Putting Econometrics in Its Place: A New Direction in Applied Economics (published by Edward Elgar).
- ^ Backhouse, R. and Jeff Biddle (2000) 'The concept of applied economics: a history of ambiguity and multiple meanings', History of Applied Economics 32 (annual supplement), 2000.
- ^ Colander, David (1992). "Retrospectives: The Lost Art of Economics". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 6 (3): 191–198 [p. 197–198]. doi:10.1257/jep.6.3.191. JSTOR 2138310.