Aural diversity

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Aural diversity" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions. (June 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (June 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Aural Diversity describes the plurality of the sense of hearing, encompassing the whole of human and animal nature and extending to machine listening.^[1] The Aural Diversity Infographic shows its scope, including: the many changes in so-called “normal” hearing that occur over a lifetime; the universal variations that affect everybody's hearing; the medically identifiable hearing conditions of roughly one sixth of the world's population; and an array of technologies that mediate hearing, such as hearing aids, prosthetics (e.g. cochlear implants, auditory brainstem implants, middle ear implants and bone conduction implants), and all kinds of hearable devices.

An important feature of Aural Diversity is the recognition that it includes not only the many forms of hearing loss, but also an increased sensitivity to sound in conditions such as auditory processing disorder, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, tinnitus, hyperacusis, misophonia and various types of neurodivergence. The ways in which sound may be heard, processed and understood vary greatly. Existing standards^[2] articulate a notion of “otological normalcy” based on the hearing of healthy 18-25 year-olds (who represent roughly 17% of the population). Aural Diversity therefore challenges the tacit assumptions that underpin disciplines ranging from auditory science and acoustics to audiology and acoustical engineering, from architecture and design to music and psychology.^[1]

The study of Aural Diversity focuses on these differences and their implications for any situation involving sound. It is therefore characterized by its transdisciplinarity, welcoming not only traditional academic papers, but also sharing of lived experience and the creation of artworks that are regarded as equally important to increasing scientific understanding and social acceptance. In general, it avoids terms like “impairment”, “deficit”, and “loss”, preferring instead more neutral words such as “difference”. There is an overlap with Disability Studies and with Deaf culture, but the scope of Aural Diversity concerns itself with the full spectrum of hearing difference.