Barr v. City of Columbia | |
---|---|
Argued October 14–15, 1963 Decided June 22, 1964 | |
Full case name | Charles F. Barr, et al. v. City of Columbia |
Citations | 378 U.S. 146 (more) 84 S. Ct. 1734; 12 L. Ed. 2d 766; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 820 |
Case history | |
Prior | Conviction affirmed, 239 S.C. 395, 123 S.E.2d 521, cert. granted, 374 U.S. 804 (1963). |
Holding | |
The state breach of the peace convictions could not stand as there was no evidence to support them, and the criminal trespass convictions were reversed for the reasons stated in Bouie v. City of Columbia. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Black, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | Douglas |
Concurrence | Goldberg, joined by Warren |
Laws applied | |
US Const. amend. XIV |
Barr v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 146 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court decision that reversed the breach of peace and criminal trespass convictions of five African Americans who were refused service at a lunch counter of a department store.[1] The Court held that there was insufficient evidence to support the breach of peace convictions, and reversed the criminal trespass convictions for the reasons stated in another case that was decided that same day, Bouie v. City of Columbia, which held that the retroactive application of an expanded construction of a criminal statute was barred by due process of ex post facto laws.[2]