This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (August 2017) |
Bartnicki v. Vopper | |
---|---|
Argued December 5, 2000 Decided May 21, 2001 | |
Full case name | Bartnicki et al. v. Vopper, aka Williams, et al. |
Citations | 532 U.S. 514 (more) 121 S. Ct. 1753; 149 L. Ed. 2d 787; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3815 |
Case history | |
Prior | 200 F.3d 109 (3d Cir. 1999); cert. granted, 530 U.S. 1260 (2000). |
Holding | |
A broadcaster cannot be held civilly liable for publishing documents or tapes illegally procured by a third-party. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stevens, joined by O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Concurrence | Breyer, joined by O'Connor |
Dissent | Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Thomas |
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case relieving a media defendant of liability for broadcasting a taped conversation of a labor official talking to other union members about a teachers' strike.[1]
At trial, the parties stipulated that the taped conversation had been recorded in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Nevertheless, the Court held the broadcast was legal.