Bonnell (microarchitecture)

Bonnell
General information
Launched2008
Discontinued2013
Common manufacturer
  • Intel
Performance
Max. CPU clock rate600 MHz to 2.13 GHz
FSB speeds400 MHz to 667 MHz
Architecture and classification
Technology node45 nm to 32 nm
Instruction setx86-16, IA-32,
x86-64 (some)
InstructionsMMX
Extensions
Physical specifications
Cores
  • 1, 2
Package
Products, models, variants
Core names
  • Silverthorne
  • Diamondville
  • Pineview
  • Tunnel Creek
  • Lincroft
  • Stellarton
  • Sodaville
  • Cedarview
History
SuccessorSilvermont

Bonnell is a CPU microarchitecture used by Intel Atom processors which can execute up to two instructions per cycle.[1][2] Like many other x86 microprocessors, it translates x86 instructions (CISC instructions) into simpler internal operations (sometimes referred to as micro-ops, effectively RISC style instructions) prior to execution. The majority of instructions produce one micro-op when translated, with around 4% of instructions used in typical programs producing multiple micro-ops. The number of instructions that produce more than one micro-op is significantly fewer than the P6 and NetBurst microarchitectures. In the Bonnell microarchitecture, internal micro-ops can contain both a memory load and a memory store in connection with an ALU operation, thus being more similar to the x86 level and more powerful than the micro-ops used in previous designs.[3] This enables relatively good performance with only two integer ALUs, and without any instruction reordering, speculative execution or register renaming. A side effect of having no speculative execution is invulnerability against Meltdown and Spectre.

The Bonnell microarchitecture therefore represents a partial revival of the principles used in earlier Intel designs such as P5 and the i486, with the sole purpose of enhancing the performance per watt ratio. However, Hyper-Threading is implemented in an easy (i.e. low-power) way to employ the whole pipeline efficiently by avoiding the typical single thread dependencies.[3]

  1. ^ Moriarty, Jeff (1 April 2008). "'Atom 101' - Deciphering the Intel codewords around MIDs". Archived from the original on 27 August 2010. Retrieved 4 August 2010.
  2. ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (27 January 2010). "Why Pine Trail Isn't Much Faster Than the First Atom". AnandTech. Retrieved 4 August 2010.
  3. ^ a b Lal Shimpi, Anand (2 April 2008). "Intel's Atom Architecture: The Journey Begins". AnandTech. Retrieved 4 April 2010.