Branzburg v. Hayes | |
---|---|
Argued February 23, 1972 Decided June 29, 1972 | |
Full case name | Branzburg v. John P. Hayes, Judge, etc., et al.; In the Matter of Paul Pappas; United States v. Earl Caldwell |
Citations | 408 U.S. 665 (more) 92 S. Ct. 2646; 33 L. Ed. 2d 626; 1972 U.S. LEXIS 132; 24 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 2125; 1 Media L. Rep. 2617 |
Case history | |
Prior |
|
Holding | |
The First Amendment's protection of press freedom does not give the reporter's privilege in court. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | White, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist |
Concurrence | Powell |
Dissent | Douglas |
Dissent | Stewart, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. I; Ky. Rev. Stat. 421.100 (1962) |
Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court invalidating the use of the First Amendment as a defense for reporters summoned to testify before a grand jury. The case was argued February 23, 1972, and decided June 29 of the same year.[1] The reporters lost their case by a vote of 5–4. This case is cited for the rule that in federal courts, a reporter may not generally avoid testifying in a criminal grand jury, and is one of a limited number of cases[2][3] in which the U.S. Supreme Court has considered the use of reporters' privilege.