Brown v. Maryland | |
---|---|
Decided March, 1827 | |
Full case name | Brown v. State of Maryland |
Citations | 25 U.S. 419 (more) |
Holding | |
Maryland’s tax on imports interferes with the federal government's control of commerce with foreign nations. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Marshall, joined by Washington, Duvall, Story, Johnson, Trimble |
Dissent | Thompson |
Laws applied | |
Import-Export Clause, Commerce Clause |
Brown v. Maryland, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 (1827), was a significant United States Supreme Court case which interpreted the Import-Export and Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution to prohibit discriminatory taxation by states against imported items after importation, rather than only at the time of importation. The state of Maryland passed a law requiring importers of foreign goods to obtain a license for selling their products. Brown was charged under this law and appealed. It was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court construed the Import-Export Clause.[1] Chief Justice John Marshall delivered the opinion of the court, ruling that Maryland's statute violated the Import-Export and Commerce Clauses and the federal law was supreme. He alleged that the power of a state to tax goods did not apply if they remained in their "original package". A license tax on the importer was essentially the same as a tax on an import itself. Despite arguing the case for Maryland, future chief justice Roger Taney admitted that the case was correctly decided.[2]