Brown v. United States (2024)

Brown v. United States
Jackson v. United States
Argued November 27, 2023
Decided May 23, 2024
Full case nameJustin Rashaad Brown v. United States
Eugene Jackson v. United States
Docket nos.22-6389
22-6640
Case history
PriorUnited States v. Brown, 47 F.4th 147 (3d Cir. 2022).

United States v. Brown (M.D. Pa. 2021).
United States v. Jackson, 55 F.4th 846 (11th Cir. 2022)

United States v. Jackson, 36 F.4th 1294 (11th Cir. 2022)
Questions presented
1) Which version of federal law should a sentencing court consult under ACCA’s categorical approach?
2) Whether the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)(ii), incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense (as the Third, Fourth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits have held), or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense (as the Eleventh Circuit held below).
Holding
A state drug conviction counts as an ACCA predicate if it involved a drug on the federal schedules at the time of that conviction.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
MajorityAlito, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, Barrett
DissentJackson, joined by Kagan; Gorsuch (only parts I, II, III)

Brown v. United States, (Docket Nos. 22-6389 and 22–6640), is a United States Supreme Court case about the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). The Supreme Court affirmed both courts of appeals, holding that a state drug conviction counts as an ACCA predicate if it involved a drug on the federal schedules at the time of that conviction.