Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC | |
---|---|
Argued October 12, 2010 Decided February 22, 2011 | |
Full case name | Russell Bruesewitz and Robalee Bruesewitz, Parents and Natural Guardians of Hannah Bruesewitz, A Minor Child, And In Their Own Right v. Wyeth LLC F/K/A Wyeth Laboratories, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Wyeth Lederle, Wyeth Lederle Vaccines, and Lederle Laboratories |
Docket no. | 09-152 |
Citations | 562 U.S. 223 (more) 131 S. Ct. 1068; 179 L. Ed. 2d 1 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | Summary judgment granted to defendants, E.D. Pa.; affirmed, 561 F.3d 233 (3rd Cir. 2009); cert. granted, 559 U.S. 991 (2010). |
Holding | |
The 1986 Vaccine Act preempts all vaccine design defect claims against vaccine manufacturers. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito |
Concurrence | Breyer |
Dissent | Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg |
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act |
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case that decided whether a section of the Vaccine Act of 1986 preempts all vaccine design defect claims against vaccine manufacturers.