Bulgarian epigraphic monuments

Bulgarian epigraphic monuments
Sheikh's freezing stone Abu Becra Mamuk Bin Berkaya. Bulgar, 1291/1292 (691 Hijra), limestone, carving, inscription in Arabic (there is no Turkic text here) Suls' handwriting. Bulgarian State Historical and Architectural Museum-Reserve. From the foundation of the Assumption Church, the fees of 1981 (J. G. Mukhametshin). Exhibition "Light of Vera-Iman Nura" for the 1100th anniversary of the adoption of Islam by the peoples of the Volga Bulgaria, the present places of the Kazan Kremlin
Map
54°58′27″N 49°01′51″E / 54.97417°N 49.03083°E / 54.97417; 49.03083
Part of a series on the
History of Tatarstan
Coat of Arms of Tatarstan
Part of a series on the
History of Chuvashia
Coat of Arms of Chuvashia
A fragment of a tombstone from the Bulgar settlement.
Northern mausoleum of the 14th century. at the Bulgar settlement. Here, inside this building, 26 tombstones of the 13th-14th centuries are collected and displayed for viewing.[1]: 168  Two more tombstones are on display at the Museum of Bulgarian Civilization.
Husain Faizkhanov(1823 or 1828 — 1866), for the first time gave a reading of the Bulgar epigraphic monuments using Chuvash linguistic data (1863)

Bulgarian epigraphic monuments[2][3][4] (Chuvash: Пăлхар эпиграфика палăкĕсем, Tatar: Болгар эпиграфика табылдыклары) - tombstones with inscriptions (epitaphs) of the 13th-14th centuries on the territory of the former Bulgarian ulus of the Golden Horde. The identified gravestones can be divided into several categories. From a "civilizational" point of view, there are such:

  • Muslim[5]: 175–182  arabographic, of which there are currently about 400 pieces;
  • Armenian[2]: 60–61 [6] ones with their own graphics, in the amount of 5 pieces and a few more obscure fragments; They also contain Arabic letters.

Muslim tombstones, in turn, can be classified according to language:

  • only with Arabic text;
  • having, in addition to Arabic, a text in some Turkic language

Depending on the type of Turkic language, the last group of monuments is divided as follows:

  • tombstones in the Turkic language (r-language (this group is the largest);
  • gravestones in Turkic z-language

There is also a classification based on the appearance of monuments, in accordance with their artistic features - 1st style and 2nd style.

Tombstones of the 1st style usually have text in z-language, and 2nd style - text in p-language. Therefore, it was initially believed that such a classification covers all the characteristics in a complex. However, there are exceptions to this correspondence.[7]: 12, 23 [8]

  1. ^ Мухаметшин Д. Г. Yusupov and the problems of Tatar epigraphy. Archived 2023-09-15 at the Wayback Machine // Volga region archeology. 2014, №4(10)
  2. ^ a b Мухаметшин Д. Г., Хакимзянов Ф. С. Эпиграфические памятники города Булгара Archived 2021-05-07 at the Wayback Machine. Казань: Таткниго- издат, 1987. 128 с. (See also на другом электронном ресурсе Archived 2023-09-15 at the Wayback Machine — сайт Чувашского государственного институьта гуманитарных наук)
  3. ^ Татарская эпиграфическая традиция. Булгарские эпиграфические памятники XIII–XIV вв. Кн. 1. Archived 2023-06-17 at the Wayback Machine / Авт.-сост.: И.Г. Гумеров, А.М. Ахунов, В.М. Усманов. – Казань: ИЯЛИ им. Г. Ибрагимова, 2021. – 160 с. ISBN 978-5-93091-410-8
  4. ^ Татарская эпиграфическая традиция. Булгарские эпиграфические памятники XIII–XIV вв. Кн. 2. Archived 2023-09-15 at the Wayback Machine / Авт.-сост.: И.Г. Гумеров, А.М. Ахунов, В.М. Усманов. – Казань: ИЯЛИ им. Г. Ибрагимова, 2021. – 160 с. ISBN 978-5-93091-411-5
  5. ^ Измайлов И.Л Средневековые булгары: становление этнополитической общности в VIII – первой трети XIII века. Archived 2023-09-15 at the Wayback Machine – Казань: Институт истора.ии им. Ш. Марджани АН РТ, 2022. – 736 с.; 16 с. ил. ISBN 978-5-94981-383-6
  6. ^ Малышев А. Б. Армяне в этнокультурных взаимодействиях на территории Золотой Орды Archived 2021-07-09 at the Wayback Machine. // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия История. Международные отношения. 2016. Том 16, вып. 3. — С.257-258
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference ДМ was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Юсупов. Указ. соч. С.36-37.