| Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued October 14, 2015 Decided January 20, 2016 | |
| Full case name | Campbell-Ewald Company, Petitioner v. Jose Gomez |
| Docket no. | 14–857 |
| Citations | 577 U.S. 153 (more) 136 S. Ct. 663; 193 L. Ed. 2d 571 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan |
| Concurrence | Thomas (in judgment) |
| Dissent | Roberts, joined by Scalia, Alito |
| Dissent | Alito |
| Laws applied | |
| Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 | |
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 577 U.S. 153 (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified whether a case becomes moot when a party provides a settlement offer that satisfies a named plaintiff's claims in a class action suit and whether a government contractor is entitled to "derivative sovereign immunity".[1]
- ^ Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14–857, 577 U.S. 153, slip op. at 1-2 (2016).