Cauldron II: The Pumpkin Strikes Back

Cauldron II: The Pumpkin Strikes Back
Artwork of a vertical rectangular box. The top portion reads "Cauldron•II The Pumpkin Strikes Back" and the bottom portion reads "Spectrum". Depicted behind a black background is a witch with long green hair and a long pointed nose. The witch holds an orange pumpkin in both hands.
Cover art by Steve Brown
Developer(s)Palace Software
Publisher(s)Palace Software
Designer(s)Steve Brown
Programmer(s)Richard Leinfellner and Stan Schembri
Composer(s)Richard Joseph
Platform(s)Amstrad CPC, Commodore 64, ZX Spectrum, Commodore Plus 4
Release1986[1]
Genre(s)Action-adventure, platform
Mode(s)Single-player

Cauldron II: The Pumpkin Strikes Back is a video game developed and published by British developer Palace Software as a sequel to their 1985 game Cauldron. The 2D platform game was released in 1986 for the ZX Spectrum, Commodore 64, and Amstrad CPC home computers. Players control a bouncing pumpkin that is on a quest of vengeance against the "Witch Queen". The roles of the two were reversed from the first game, in which the witch defeated a monstrous pumpkin.

Following the success of Cauldron, Palace employee Steve Brown began work on a sequel. To provide fans of the original title with a new experience, a very different style of gameplay was implemented for the sequel, although several minor features retained connections to the first. Inspired by the bouncing pumpkin character in Cauldron, Brown designed the game around the character's movement. The bouncing mechanic proved problematic for the programmers who were unable to perfect its implementation. Technical limitations also prevented them from implementing certain animations, such as turning pages of a book.

Cauldron II was first released on the Commodore 64. It was released in the following years on other systems and as re-releases. The game received praise, mainly for its audio-visuals, in video game magazines. Difficulty in handling the bouncing pumpkin's movement was a common complaint, although reviewers felt the overall package was of good value.

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference CVG-Review was invoked but never defined (see the help page).