| City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued November 10, 2021 Decided April 21, 2022 | |
| Full case name | City of Austin, Texas v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC |
| Docket no. | 20-1029 |
| Citations | 596 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Holding | |
| The distinction between on-premises signs and off-premises signs in the city of Austin’s sign code is facially content-neutral under the First Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Kagan, Kavanaugh |
| Concurrence | Breyer |
| Concur/dissent | Alito (concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part) |
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Gorsuch, Barrett |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. I | |
City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the application of zoning restrictions on digital billboards in the city of Austin, Texas. In a 6–3 ruling, the Court ruled that the Austin regulation against off-premise digital signs was content-neutral and thus should be reviewed as a facial challenge rather than a strict scrutiny following from the reasoning in Reed v. Town of Gilbert.