Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski

Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 12, 1989
Full case nameCoinbase, Inc. v. Suski
Citations602 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
Where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Case opinion
MajorityJackson, joined by unanimous

Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, 602 U.S. ___ (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs.[1][2]

  1. ^ Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, 602 U.S. ___ (1989)
  2. ^ "Courts rather than arbitrators to decide whether Dogecoin dispute goes to arbitration". SCOTUSblog. 2024-05-28. Retrieved 2024-10-16.