Act of Parliament | |
Long title | An Act to amend the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002; make provision in connection with terrorist property; create corporate offences for cases where a person associated with a body corporate or partnership facilitates the commission by another person of a tax evasion offence; and for connected purposes. |
---|---|
Citation | 2017 c. 22 |
Introduced by | Amber Rudd, Home Secretary (Commons) Susan Williams, Baroness Williams of Trafford (Lords) |
Territorial extent | United Kingdom |
Dates | |
Royal assent | 27 April 2017 |
Other legislation | |
Amends | Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 |
Status: Current legislation | |
History of passage through Parliament | |
Text of statute as originally enacted | |
Revised text of statute as amended |
The Criminal Finances Act 2017 (c. 22) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that amends the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to expand the provisions for confiscating funds to deal with terrorist property and proceeds of tax evasion.
The Act received Royal Assent on 27 April 2017.[1] According to its long title, the purpose of the Act is to:
amend the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002; make provision in connection with terrorist property; create corporate offences for cases where a person associated with a body corporate or partnership facilitates the commission by another person of a tax evasion offence; and for connected purposes.
Part 3 of the Act creates the corporate offences of failure of a company or partnership to prevent facilitation of UK tax evasion and failure to prevent facilitation of foreign tax evasion offences. Technically these are two distinct offences, depending on whether the tax which is evaded is UK taxation or foreign taxation. Companies and partnerships are required to take 'reasonable' action to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion and Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC), who are responsible for implementation of the legislation, argues that "the procedures that are considered reasonable will change as time passes".[2]
Hong Kong-based law firm, King & Wood Mallesons, has described the Act as "a highly effective piece of legislation".[3]