Cruz v. New York | |
---|---|
Argued December 1, 1986 Decided April 21, 1987 | |
Full case name | Eulogio Cruz v. New York |
Citations | 481 U.S. 186 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | Demurrer overruled, N.Y. |
Holding | |
The Confrontation Clause bars the admission, in a joint trial, of a non-testifying codefendant's confession incriminating the defendant, even if the defendant's own confession is admitted against him. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens |
Dissent | White, joined by Rehnquist, Powell, O'Connor |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. VI |
Cruz v. New York, 481 U.S. 186 (1987), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the Confrontation Clause of the Constitution's Sixth Amendment barred the admission, in a joint trial, of a non-testifying codefendant's confession incriminating the defendant, even if the defendant's own confession was admitted against him.