Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,250 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 6 November 2024 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 28 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 4 months ago. |
Submission declined on 28 June 2024 by MarcGarver (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MarcGarver 4 months ago. |
Submission declined on 27 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 4 months ago. |
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (June 2024) |
A Place Under the Sun | |
---|---|
Directed by | Jason Lopchan |
Screenplay by | Jason Lopchan |
Produced by |
|
Starring |
|
Cinematography | Prabin Limbu |
Edited by | Jason Lopchan |
Production company | One Squad Films Pvt. Ltd. |
Running time | 105 minutes |
Country | Nepal |
Language | Nepali |
A Place Under the Sun (Nepali: सुर्य मुनि एक ठाउँ) is a 2024 Nepali Crime Drama film, written and directed by Jason Lopchan under the banner of 1 Squad Films Pvt. Ltd.[1] The film stars Min Ghalan, Meera Gurung, Biplov Gauli, Amshu Sharma, Prajan Poudel, Prabesh MC and Riden Shrestha.[2]
The film is entirely shot on Iphone 14 Pro Max and is the first ever Nepali film to do so. The film is produced by 1 Squad Films and co-produced by Umesh Khadka. A Place Under the Sun is written, directed and edited by Jason Lopchan. Prabin Limbu serves as the direction of photography. [3][4]
The film received praised for its unorthodox storytelling, striking cinematography, and strong performances from the cast, though some criticism were aimed towards extremely long takes and sound design. [5][6][7]
The film's trailer was official released on OSR Digital and the film on Amazon Prime Video. [8][9][10][11]
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)