| Submission declined on 10 October 2024 by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 4 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by CFA 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 May 2020 by AaqibAnjum (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by AaqibAnjum 4 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 14 April 2020 by Kirbanzo (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Kirbanzo 4 years ago. | |
Comment: This page missed what proving notability is about. It has to demonstrate that he meets one of more of WP:NPROF using reliable sources. Currently all it does is describe him, with sections such as "Scientific Contributions" having zero sources; as written that whole section should be removed. Also being a member of societies is routine, WP:MILL and does not belong. If you cut this in half and remove the fluff he might pass notability. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Still lacking reliable, independent, secondary sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Currently the submission only uses one source, which is not ideal for verifiability, especially for a biography of a living person such as this submission. Please add additional reliable, independent, secondary sources which provide significant coverage of the subject. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 01:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Akira Sawa | |
|---|---|
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Clinical Psychiatry, Molecular /Cellular Neuroscience, Neuropsychopharmacology |
| Institutions | Johns Hopkins UniversityJohns Hopkins Hospital |
| Doctoral advisor | Solomon H. Snyder |
Dr. Akira Sawa is a psychiatrist and neuroscientist at Johns Hopkins University and Hospital in Maryland, the United States.