Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,418 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 28 October 2023 by Ldm1954 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 12 July 2023 by Drmies (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Drmies 14 months ago. |
Antentor O Hinton, Jr. | |
---|---|
Born | 1988 (age 35–36) |
Alma mater | Baylor College of Medicine Winston Salem State University |
Scientific career | |
Institutions | Vanderbilt University University of Iowa |
Thesis | Estrogen Receptor Alpha & Steroid Receptor Co-Activator-1 Are Important for Blood Pressure Control (2016) |
Website | Hinton Lab |
Antentor O Hinton, Jr. (born 1988) is a Molecular Physiologist who serves as Assistant Professor of at the Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics at the Vanderbilt School of Medicine Basic Sciences at Vanderbilt University.[1]. His work utilizes Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy (FIBSEM) and Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBFSEM) imaging studies on mitochondrial networks in human disease with a focus on the molecular mechanisms regulated by insulin that influence cristae and mitochondria dynamics in pathophysiological conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease.[2]. Dr. Antentor Hinton has several publications devoted to mapping structure of mitochondria at different life stages [3]. He is on the editorial board of Circulation Research, Aging Cell, Aging Advances, Scientific Reports, American Journal of Physiology – Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Journal of Cellular Physiology. and the Advanced Biology (from Wiley journal) [4]. He is also the associate editor of the specialty section of Bioenergetics in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (from Frontiers Media). Notably, in 2023, he headed an article on Juneteenth which led to the first diversity, equity, and inclusion cover in the journal Cell [5]. This article was discussed within Forbes, CBS News, and other newspapers, contributing to ongoing discussions of the need for diversity in field of STEM [6].
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.