Submission declined on 25 June 2024 by S0091 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Company type | Subsidiary |
|---|---|
| Industry | Nonmetallic Mineral Mining |
| Headquarters | , Canada |
| Products | Diamonds |
| Revenue |  $720.57 million USD (2016).[1] |
| $7.99 million USD (2016)[1] | |
Number of employees | 1625 (including contractors).[2] |
| Parent |
|
| Website | burgundydiamonds |
Arctic Canadian Diamond Company is a Canadian diamond mining company wholly owned by Burgundy Diamond Mines Limited. Burgundy Diamond Mines purchased Arctic Canadian and 100 percent of its assets including Ekati Diamond Mine in July 2023 and continues to operate as a subsidiary[3]. Burgundy Diamond Mines is publicly traded on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX:BDM).
Aside from its corporate office in Calgary,[4] it also has cleaning and sorting facilities in Yellowknife and Mumbai and a marketing office in Antwerp, Belgium.
- ^ a b "Dominion Diamond Corp. Income Statement". Google Finance. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
- ^ "2018 Socio-Economic Agreement Report" (PDF). Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ "Burgundy Diamond completes acquisition of Arctic Canadian Diamond Company". Mining Technology. 2023-07-05. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
- ^ "Contact Details". Dominion Diamond Corporation. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.