Submission declined on 29 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |
Submission declined on 4 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CFA 49 days ago. |
Submission declined on 3 August 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 50 days ago. |
Author | William Hertling |
---|---|
Language | English |
Series | Singularity series |
Genre | Science fiction, Technothriller, Singularity |
Published | 2011 |
Publisher | Liquididea Press |
Publication date | November 19, 2011 |
Publication place | United States |
Media type | Kindle, Audiobook, Paperback |
Pages | 300, paperback |
ISBN | 9780984755707 |
Followed by | A.I. Apocalypse |
Avogadro Corp: The Singularity is Closer than it Appears by William Hertling is a near-term technothriller science fiction novel about an accidental creation of an artificial intelligence. The novel is the first installation in the Singularity series and centers around David Ryan, a software engineer working on ELOPe, an email language optimization program. In an attempt to save his project from cancellation, David inadvertently embeds a hidden directive in the software, unintentionally sparking the creation of an autonomous AI. The book is the winner of the Science Fiction DIY Book Festival 2011-2012 and Forewords Review Science Fiction Book of the Year.[1][2]