| Submission declined on 6 October 2024 by Ca (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 3 September 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Utopes 42 days ago. | |
Comment: Please read WP:CITEBOMB. Most of the sources only mention the software once without elaborating on it. Axivion Suite is used by software developers in various industries, e.g., automation technology[9][10], automotive[11][12][13], consulting and engineering services[14], electronics[15], mechanical engineering[16], and medical technology[17][18].
are prime examples. Many of the sources are also affilated with Axivion and related organization or are written by the company's employees. Please remove wherever possible. Ca talk to me! 08:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
| Original author(s) | Axivion Bauhaus Project |
|---|---|
| Developer(s) | Qt Quality Assurance |
| Initial release | July 24, 2004 |
| Stable release | 7.7.5
/ April 16, 2024 |
| Operating system | Linux, Microsoft Windows, and macOS |
| Type | Static Code Analysis, Software Architecture Analysis Tool |
| License | Proprietary commercial software |
| Website | www |
| Company type | Subsidiary |
|---|---|
| Industry | static program analysis |
| Founded | November 2006 |
| Fate | Acquired by Qt Group in August 2022 |
| Headquarters | formerly Stuttgart, Germany |
| Products | Axivion Suite, Bauhaus Suite |
Number of employees | 30+ |
| Parent | Qt Group |
| Website | www |
Axivion Suite is a software suite that includes static code analysis and automated software architecture analysis tools. It was originally developed by the German company Axivion GmbH..[1]. Axivion GmbH was acquired by Qt Group in August 2022.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.