Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,027 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 8 November 2024 by CanonNi (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 6 November 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by CFA 6 days ago. |
Submission declined on 5 November 2024 by Tavantius (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Tavantius 7 days ago. |
Battle of Biar Bet (1965) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the prelude to the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965 | |||||||||
| |||||||||
Belligerents | |||||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
Gen. Musa Khan Hazara Maj. Gen. Tikka Khan Brig. Iftikhar Khan Janjua Brig. Mohammad Azhar Brig. Sardar Ismail Brig. S. M. Aslam |
Maj. Gen. P. C Gupta Gen. J. N. Chaudhuri Brig. S. S. M. Pahalajani Lt. Gen. K. Sundarji Maj. Karnail Singh (POW) | ||||||||
Units involved | |||||||||
6 Brigade 52 Brigade 24 Cavalry 88 Mortar |
3 Para 2 Para Sardar Post garrison Biar Bet garrison | ||||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||||
~150 killed and wounded 3 tanks disabled |
~120 killed and wounded 2 POW (including Major Karnail Singh) |
The Battle of Biar Bet was an engagement between Indian and Pakistani forces in the prelude to the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965, during Pakistan's Rann of Kutch Campaign. During the battle, Pakistan captured the post along with Chhad Bet and held them until the end of the year, until when it was handed back to the Indians while the Pakistanis gained some land.