| Submission declined on 21 November 2024 by Sam Sailor (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 November 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Greenman 2 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 November 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Qcne 13 days ago. | |
Comment: I have removed all the "citations" that did not mention him, but was used as padding. If we further look at the reliability of the remaining sources, we are not near a pass of WP:BASIC. If there really is no substantial, reliable sources that mention him, I think it is too soon. Sam Sailor 08:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources that go to the front page of a website, and make no mention of the subject, are both insufficient to establish notability, and are useless in verifying the given statement.See also WP:COI, WP:AUTOBIO. Greenman (talk) 13:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Boitumelo Ben "BB" Senokoane (born August 18, 1979) is a South African theologian, professor, unionist, politician, and public intellectual. He is known for his contributions to systematic theology, African religious thought, and his insights on Africa's socio-economic development within the global context. Senokoane is an Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy, Practical, and Systematic Theology at the University of South Africa (UNISA)..[1]
- ^ "BRICS group viewed as a beacon of hope for Africa – Academic". Big News Network. Retrieved 2024-11-19.