Submission declined on 21 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |
Submission declined on 18 January 2024 by Spinster300 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Spinster300 9 months ago. |
Brent C. Landau is an author, biblical scholar,[1] lecturer,[2][3] and self-described "amateur astronomer"[4]. He is an "expert in ancient biblical languages and literature."[5][6] He has authored books, articles, papers, and dissertations, among other works.[7] Landau is known for being the first to translate the Christian apocryphon Revelation of the Magi into English in his dissertation, and his book The Revelation of the Magi: The Lost Tale of the Wise Men’s Journey to Bethlehem, which includes an annotated translation of the Revelation of the Magi with commentary.[1][2][3]
In 1998 he received a B.A., with Honors, in Religious Studies from the University of Iowa, in 2001 a M.Div from Harvard Divinity School, and ibid. a Th.D in New Testament and Early Christianity, seven years later.[2][3]
BRENT LANDAU received his Th.D. from Harvard University and is an expert in ancient biblical languages and literature.