 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,460 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 31 March 2024 by ToadetteEdit (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 27 January 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 January 2024 by LittlePuppers (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by LittlePuppers 8 months ago. | |
Comment: Most of the sources are either primary or do not mention the subject. There are a few good sources, but the promotional tone is the most blatant issue right now. LittlePuppers (talk) 03:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
| Type | Nonprofit |
|---|
Calstart is a non-profit organization for zero-emission transportation. It administers governmental programs, the majority funded by the California Air Resources Board and the California Energy Commission,[1] and provides policy analysis to support clean technology and infrastructure acceleration.[2] It is headquartered in Pasadena, California.[3] Candid, an independent charity evaluator, has given Calstart a Platinum Transparency rating.[4]
- ^ "Nonprofit Explorer". 9 May 2013.
- ^ Alec Glassford, Sergio Hernandez, Nat Lash, Andrea Suozzo, Ruth Talbot, "Calstart - Nonprofit Exporer" ProPublica. Retrieved 2024/1/29
- ^ Pasadena Chamber of Commerce and Civic Association, Non-profit Organizations and Associations Directory, Retrieved 2024/1/29
- ^ Candid Guidestar, EIN 95-4375022 "CALSTART, Inc. - GuideStar Profile"., Retrieved 2024/1/29
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.