Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 29 October 2024 by Shadow311 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Shadow311 23 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 26 October 2024 by Significa liberdade (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Significa liberdade 26 days ago. | |
Comment: Article needs in-text citations. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Clementechiton is an Aculiferan from the Clemente Formation in Mexico.It was described in 2016 ,it is the first animal in the fossil record to have eyes, and is poorly studied with all sources being from Mark McMenamin.[1]
| Genus | Species | Material | Describer | Phylum | Formation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clementechiton | C.sonorensis | One specimen | Mark McMenamin | Mollusca | Clemente Formation |
- ^ Chitons and the origin of eyes (YouTube video , channel:Mark McMenamin
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.