Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,510 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 24 March 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 7 December 2023 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by BuySomeApples 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 19 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Vanderwaalforces 9 months ago.
|
The cryptoterrestrial hypothesis, also referred to as intraterrestrial,[1] or inner-earth,[2] proposes that unidentified flying objects are a sign of a technologically advanced population living on Earth alongside humans.[3][4][5] The idea has been around since the beginning of the 20th century, was associated with the Shaver mystery and Walter Siegmeister, and underwent several reformulations, most notoriously by American journalist John Keel, French scientist and ufologist Jacques Vallée and American novelist and blogger Mac Tonnies. It is often associated with the concept of a Hollow Earth and the Silurian hypothesis, however the three are not equivalent and other theories have been put forth to account for the UFOs’ nature and origin within this framework.
This hypothesis is coinsidered pseudoscientific in nature, just like the disciplines concerned with its study such as cryptozoology and ufology. Furthermore, in spite of its early popularity, the concept that UFOs could be indigenous to planet Earth is considered unconventional even amongst ufologists.[6][7][8]
This book documents a most unconventional slant on the enduring UFO mystery.
However, there is also a third minority class of hypothesis: an unconventional terrestrial explanation, outside the prevailing consensus view of the universe