 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,461 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 1 April 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: Unclear that this individual meets WP:GNG, WP:BIO or WP:NACADEMIC. Article has numerous assertions that are not supported by inline citations. Significant coverage about Shottenkirk (not just works by her) in reliable, independent, secondary sources is needed to meet Wikipedia guidelines on notability Paul W (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. |
Dena Shottenkirk is an American moral and political philosopher, artist, and founder of the art and public philosophy nonprofit talkPOPc,[1] whose work centers on the intersection of epistemology, perception, and aesthetics.[2] She is an Associate Professor at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.[3]
- ^ "Who we are". talkPOPc.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
:1was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "Faculty Profile".