Draft:Elestor

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,207 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Elestor (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 4 days ago by Lstr1 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 0 seconds ago

Submission declined on 11 October 2024 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Chaotic Enby 4 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Elestor B.V. is a Dutch company established in 2014, specializing in the development and implementation of large-scale, long-duration energy storage (LDES) solutions utilizing hydrogen-based flow batteries. The company's technology employs an electrochemical process, where two active materials are separated by membrane stacks, enabling the movement of protons to store and release energy during charging and discharging cycles. Elestor's batteries are designed to be efficient, scalable, and cost-effective, offering solutions that can be deployed globally to meet the increasing demand for renewable energy.^[1] The technology can store energy for durations ranging from 8 to over 100 hours, which is crucial for stabilizing power grids and optimizing the use of wind and solar energy. By addressing the intermittency of renewable energy sources, Elestor's long-duration storage solutions facilitate the integration of renewable energy into the grid, contributing to a stable and reliable energy supply.^[2]

Elestor's technology has the potential to serve as a substitute for fossil fuel power plants at a gigawatt-hour (GWh) scale, functioning as "bi-directional power plants."^[3] Designed for large-scale, long-duration energy storage, this technology aims to play a role in the energy sector comparable to that of lithium-ion batteries within the mobility industry. By facilitating the large-scale storage and distribution of renewable energy, it offers a sustainable alternative to conventional power generation methods, supporting the transition to cleaner energy sources.

Elestor has secured investment from notable entities such as Equinor, Vopak, and Koolen Industries, as well as climate-focused investment funds and government bodies committed to advancing sustainable technology. These partnerships have facilitated the company's growth and contribution to the global energy transition. In recognition of its innovation, the Amsterdam Centre for Business Innovation at the University of Amsterdam named Elestor as one of the ten most innovative companies in the Netherlands. The company has successfully completed several pilot projects and is preparing to launch its first commercial products by 2025, with a focus on long-duration energy storage solutions.^[4][5]