 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,314 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 6 August 2024 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 14 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by SafariScribe 3 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 4 June 2024 by Drmies (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Drmies 4 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 4 June 2024 by TechnoSquirrel69 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by TechnoSquirrel69 4 months ago.
| |
Comment: You are welcome to rewrite the article, but do not remove the AfC history as you did here. Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Hard to escape the impression that this is a promotional piece; actual notability is difficult to assess in part because of incomplete citations, and many of the citations (bare URLs) being company links. Drmies (talk) 23:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks for your submission! I am declining this for now as the draft relies too heavily on primary sources and does not establish the subject's notability. Please click on the links above for more information, and change the sourcing to use more reliable sources instead. A couple of the links currently in § External links could be good resources. Let me know if you have any questions! (please
mention me on reply; thanks!) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Group14 Technologies is an American manufacturer and supplier of advanced silicon battery technology for rechargeable lithium-silicon batteries.[1] Headquartered in Woodinville, Washington, Group14 operates one commercial factory in Woodinville, Washington, and is building a second commercial factory in Moses Lake, Washington. [2] Group14 is partnering with SK, Inc. to build a joint venture factory in Sangju, South Korea. [3] In July 2023, Group14 acquired Schmid Silicon Group and plans to restart a silane facility in Spreetal, Germany. [4][5]
Group14 currently delivers its silicon battery technology, SCC55TM, to customers including Porsche for electric vehicle batteries and Amperex Technology Limited (ATL) for smartphones. [6][7][8]
- ^ "Home". Group14.
- ^ "Group14, the Washington company at the center of the EV lithium battery revolution - Axios Seattle".
- ^ Hye-jin, Byun (December 17, 2023). "[Herald Interview] Group14, SK Materials to operate Asia's largest silicon plant for EVs". The Korea Herald.
- ^ "Subscribe to read". www.ft.com.
{{cite web}}: Cite uses generic title (help) - ^ "US battery firm restarts German silane plant". Chemical & Engineering News.
- ^ "Porsche AG acquires stake in innovative producer of battery materials". Porsche Newsroom. April 5, 2022.
- ^ https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/porsche-leads-400-million-investment-ev-battery-startup-group14-2022-05-04/
- ^ https://www.fastcompany.com/91040975/group14-technologies-most-innovative-companies-2024
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.