Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,648 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 1 May 2024 by Clearfrienda (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Harry Destecroix | |
---|---|
Born | 10 April 1987 |
Occupation(s) | Entrepreneur, Investor, Scientist |
Known for | Science Creates, Ziylo, SCVC |
Harry Destecroix (born 10 April 1987) is a British scientist, entrepreneur, and investor. Harry co-founded the biotech start-up Ziylo which was acquired by Novo Nordisk for up to $800 million in 2018[1][2]. He founded Science Creates in 2017 which has established two deep tech incubators in Bristol, with a third in development[3][4], and two UKRI-funded accelerator programs for engineering biology[5][6][7]. Harry is founder and Managing Partner of SCVC, a Venture Capital firm that invests in early-stage deep tech start-ups[8][9][10][11].