| Submission declined on 10 September 2024 by Aaron Liu (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 2 February 2024 by Cabrils (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Cabrils 9 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 11 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 3 November 2023 by M4V3R1CK32 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by M4V3R1CK32 12 months ago. | |
Comment: I think the sources do give enough notability. Prose can very much be fixed—by you, me, or someone else. Aaron Liu (talk) 12:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: interviews are not reliable independent sources so cannot be used to establish any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 15:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Content like "served as both an escape from a course that didn't ignite his passion and a way to reconnect with his creative side" has no place in an encyclopaedia. Theroadislong (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:DIRECTOR) but presently it is not clear that it does.As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles 'Your First Article', 'Referencing for Beginners' and 'Easier Referencing for Beginners'.Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, Twitter, YouTube).Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not.Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link).Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:DIRECTOR criteria #1, because XXXXX").You may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 02:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Only the first source (repeated as source 4) in this list ppossibly contributes to notability. Others are primary or passing mentions and don't contribute to notability. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 00:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hugo de Almeida ( Santa Maria da Feira, April 27, 1980) is a Portuguese director and producer. Among his most recent projects are the documentaries UBI: A Path to Freedom about the possible implementation of an Unconditional Basic Income in Portugal and Continuity, which portrays the experience lived by the band Hercules and Love Affair during the production of their fifth album. Carne: The Unsustainable Footprint[1], the first portuguese documentary about the ecological footprint of meat, won the award for the best documentary at the Frankfurt Indie Stars Film Festival 2024.