Submission rejected on 9 September 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Curb Safe Charmer 37 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. |
Submission declined on 4 January 2023 by TheChunky (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by TheChunky 21 months ago. |
Submission declined on 1 November 2022 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Greenman 23 months ago. |
Submission declined on 16 May 2022 by AngusWOOF (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by AngusWOOF 2 years ago. |
Submission declined on 5 May 2022 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 2 years ago. |
Submission declined on 19 December 2021 by QuantumRealm (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by QuantumRealm 2 years ago. |
Innocent Kawooya | |
---|---|
Born | 1988-01-30 |
Nationality | Ugandan |
Citizenship | Uganda |
Education | Victoria Nursery schools, Molly and Paul Primary school, St. Henry Kitovu(O-Level), |
Occupation | Computer Programmer & FinTech Financial inclusion specialist |
Organization | HiPipo Foundation |
Known for | FinTech and financial inclusion, Internet entrepreneurship, film production and Music & Awards. |
Notable work | HiPipo Music Awards, Co-directed and co-produced Life of a Champion movie, HiPipo Foundation, 40 Days 40 Fintechs. The Digital Impact Awards Africa |
Title | CEO, HiPipo |
Children | 3 |
Parents |
|
Awards | CEO of the Year 2021 to 2022 by TIG Network Afrika |
Website | https://www.innocentkawooya.com/ |
Innocent Kawooya is a Ugandan corporate executive, computer programmer, and a financial inclusion expert.[1] He is the co-founder and CEO for the HiPipo.[2][3] He is the CEO of The Digital Impact Awards Africa.[4] He is serving as a co-chair on the international Mojaloop Community Council.[1]