| Submission declined on 29 June 2024 by Garsh2 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 27 March 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 5 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 23 December 2023 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by BuySomeApples 8 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 10 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 August 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Greenman 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 26 July 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 13 months ago. | |
Comment: No additions since last declines. See previous comments for details. Garsh (talk) 04:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There are multiple undisclosed paid editors here. Theroadislong (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You have been notified multiple times before that you need to declare WP:COI. Personal life section entirely unsourced. Greenman (talk) 00:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 | This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (July 2023) |
John Thomas Rivers is an American entrepreneur and businessman..[1] He is the founder and CEO of 4R Restaurant Group and founded a nonprofit organization, The 4R Foundation,[2] which established 4 Roots, an alliance of community stakeholders investing in a healthy, thriving, sustainable, food system.[3][4]
- ^ Thorn, Bret (13 June 2023). "4 Rivers Smokehouse highlights the best of barbecue from across the country The Florida chain also has a retail business and ships nationwide". Nation's Restaurant News.
- ^ GuideStar. "The 4R Foundation, Inc - GuideStar Profile". guidestar.org.
- ^ Mates, Thomas (August 11, 2021). "Digital Reporter". WKMG television.
- ^ "Home - 4Roots". 4rootsfarm.org. Retrieved 2023-09-07.