| Submission declined on 25 November 2024 by TheBirdsShedTears (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 September 2024 by Tavantius (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Tavantius 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Please cite your submission with WP:RS than heavenly relying on unreliable sources. Please review WP:IS for future reference. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Karl Bozicevic | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | 1952 (age 71–72) |
| Nationality | American |
| Alma mater | George Washington University |
| Occupation(s) | Lawyer Author |
| Notable work | Cardinal Hoax (2011) |
| Website | karlbozicevicpublications |
Karl Bozicevic is an American attorney, inventor, and author.[1][2][3][4] He is known as the co-founder and partner at Bozicevic, Field and Francis, LLP.[5]
- ^ http://www.drugdeliverypatents.com/
- ^ http://www.prionpatents.com/
- ^ "Bozicevic, Field & Francis LLP - East Palo Alto, CA Office Information - Martindale.com". www.martindale.com.
- ^ "Intellectual Property Law Firm in California :Bozicevic, Field & Francis LLP". hg.org. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
- ^ "Bozicevic, Field & Francis LLP Law Firm Profile | BCGSearch.com". www.bcgsearch.com. Retrieved 2024-06-27.