| Submission declined on 15 November 2024 by Drmies (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2024 by HitroMilanese (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by HitroMilanese 9 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2024 by JJPMaster (talk). We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer. Declined by JJPMaster 9 days ago. | |
Comment: There are no secondary sources, which is pretty much mandatory for a BLP. Nor are the books proven to be important (by way of reviews), so we can hardly determine notability per WP:PROF. Drmies (talk) 01:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Large portion of this submission is unsourced. Additional references in independent and reliable sources are required to demonstrate notability per WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 07:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Laurence Anthony | |
|---|---|
| Born | 22 January 1970 |
| Nationality | British |
| Education | BSc, MA, PhD |
| Alma mater | |
| Known for | |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | |
| Institutions | |
| Website | Laurence Anthony's website |
Laurence Anthony (born 1970) is a Professor in the Center for English Language Education in Science and Engineering at Waseda University.[1]. He is known as the developer of AntCont, a corpus analysis toolkit in the AntLab suite of tools for text processing and analysis.[2] His broader interests include educational technology, corpus linguistics, the learning and teaching of English for specific purposes, and applications of AI in each[3]
- ^ Faculty profile, Waseda University. Retrieved 2024-11-14.
- ^ "CorpusCast with Dr Robbie Love: Professor Laurence Anthony on AntConc". YouTube. 4 January 2024.
- ^ "KU, KFAS hold first Linguistics Studies biennial conference". Kuwait Times. 4 March 2024.