Submission declined on 2 February 2024 by Cabrils (talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Declined by Cabrils 9 months ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:EVENTCRIT) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple publishedsecondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, Twitter, YouTube). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a promotional website, rather than an encyclopedic entry: WP:PROMO. The draft does not appear to show that the competition has any notability beyond the average coverage in trade publications for similar competitions (see WP:ROTM). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:EVENTCRIT criteria #3, because XXXXX"). You may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 02:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: This reads like something the organisers of the event would publish themselves. Wikipedia articles need to rely on independent reliable sources, and present information from a neutral, objective point of view. You should also decide whether you want to write an article about the Competition or the competition's 2023 edition. Usedtobecool☎️ 08:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
University startup competition
The Lee Kuan Yew Global Business Plan Competition (LKYGBPC), established in 2001.[1][2][3], is a biennial university startup challenge organized by the Singapore Management University (SMU). The competition is open to students or recent alumni from any university.
The most recent edition of LKYGBPC has been mentioned by Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat for its role in attracting deep tech startups to Singapore[6][7]. One such startup is PlasticFri from Sweden, the winner of the 11th LKYGBPC. PlasticFri is currently in discussions with NTUC Fairprice to pilot their products in Singapore.[8] The global funding winter contributed to rising popularity of the competition in Asia.[9]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.