 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,274 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 2 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 30 April 2024 by Xoak (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Xoak 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Theroadislong 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 April 2024 by Umakant Bhalerao (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Umakant Bhalerao 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 26 April 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Greenman 6 months ago. | |
Comment: The OP has removed primary and unreliable sources upon my instructions. And I myself have cleaned up the promo bits and copy edited the article. Also trimmed some references. I've put some of them in the talk page. IMO the company might meet borderline notability but I'll leave that to someone else to review. @Fintechfraser: you may resubmit the draft now and someone else will review it. Regards. X (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Linkedin.com and Spotify are not reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thank you for your WP:COI declaration. However, the framing of the submission is still promotional and not suitable as is. See also WP:SOLUTION. Greenman (talk) 21:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 | |
| Company type | Privately held company |
|---|---|
| Industry | |
| Founded | January 27, 2021 in London, England |
| Founders | Fraser Stewart, Gary Stewart |
| Headquarters | 128 City Road, , |
| Products | Lyfeguard |
| Services | |
| Website | lyfeguard |
Lyfeguard Limited is a UK-based financial technology company founded in 2021.[1] It develops software for personal information management, offering features such as secure storage, financial organization, and sharing capabilities. The company's software caters to both individual consumers and professionals in various financial sectors, including wealth management, mortgage brokerage, insurance, and legal services.[2][3]
- ^ "LYFEGUARD LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK". find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk. Retrieved 2024-04-26.
- ^ "Financial planning platform Lyfeguard launches in the UK". FinTech Global. 2023-02-01. Retrieved 2024-04-26.
- ^ Dawson, Nicholas (2023-03-19). "Britons urged to get 'expert guidance' on pensions". Express.co.uk. Retrieved 2024-04-26.