 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,035 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 21 October 2024 by Timtrent (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 30 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by Gene93k (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Gene93k 2 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 20 March 2024 by Mach61 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Mach61 7 months ago. | |
Comment: You have been told about CITEKILL before. Pleased deal wth "on a state level.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]" as well. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: What are the floating references doing at the end? What are they citing? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please sort this out: "Merrimack Valley Conference.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]". This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.Once we can see the references you choose we will have a chance of reviewing this draft 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Only independent reference is the Lawrence Eagle Tribune. Needs more to establish notability. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
The Merrimack Valley Conference (MVC) is a dual county high school athletic conference located in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and is named after the Merrimack River Valley, where all of the league schools are located. The conference contains schools from Middlesex County and Essex County. The conference is a member in District 4 of the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association (MIAA), which is a member of the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS). The conference has long been considered one of the best and most competitive leagues on a state level.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
 | |
| Association | Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association (MIAA) |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1940 |
| Sports fielded |
|
| Division | MIAA Division I or II |
| No. of teams | 12 (11 full members; 1 associate member) |
| Headquarters | Merrimack Valley |
| Region | Massachusetts |
| Official website | https://www.merrimackvalleyconferencema.org/ |
- ^ Hector, Longo (6 February 2011). "Death of the MVC?". The Eagle-Tribune. Retrieved 6 February 2011.
- ^ "Is the Merrimack Valley Conference the best boys' high school basketball in Massachusetts? - The Boston Globe". BostonGlobe.com.
- ^ "Iron sharpens iron in the steely-tough Merrimack Valley Conference baseball league - The Boston Globe". BostonGlobe.com.
- ^ "Welcome to the roughest, toughest lacrosse division in the state: the Merrimack Valley Conference Large, where 'every single night is a battle' - The Boston Globe". BostonGlobe.com.
- ^ "EMass boys' basketball: Merrimack Valley teams making a move in Globe Top 20 - The Boston Globe". BostonGlobe.com.
- ^ "Wrestling preview: Merrimack Valley Conference teams look strong again". December 24, 2022.
- ^ "Boston Herald boys wrestling All-Scholastics and league All-Stars". April 26, 2024.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.