Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,066 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 29 April 2024 by ToadetteEdit (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Mondex Corporation is a Toronto-based company that advocates for the restitution of art and cultural artifacts looted during the Holocaust era.[1][2] The company advocates on behalf of heirs to recover stolen art,[3][4] and its practices have led to changes in restitution law and practices in various countries.[5][6] Mondex was founded in 1993 by James Palmer. It is currently headed by Kamila Gourdie, who has served as the company's president since 2004.[7]
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.