| Submission declined on 18 September 2024 by Timtrent (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 3 June 2024 by TheTechie (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by TheTechie 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 16 May 2024 by Bearcat (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Bearcat 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 6 March 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Theroadislong 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 6 March 2024 by Umakant Bhalerao (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Umakant Bhalerao 6 months ago. | |
Comment: Far too much faux notability. Remove words like "notable" for they just emphasise that there may be none. Instead concentrate on fewer and better references. If necessary cut facts that add no value outWhat is actually cited as notable about this corporation? Lose the majority of the projects. Which are the most notaabke? Use them.Your only objective its to show genuine notability. You have concealed this in a welter of lists of stuff and excessive referencing.Cut, cut, and cut again. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thank you for including references in your submission. Please help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. ~Kvng (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This is referenced far too heavily to primary sources that are not support for notability at all (e.g. business directories, the self-published websites of organizations directly affiliated with the statement, etc.), and shows very little evidence of WP:GNG-building coverage about the company in reliable sources. We're not just looking for technical verification of facts here, we're looking for evidence that the facts led other unaffiliated people to write third party content covering and analyzing the facts as journalism and/or in books. Bearcat (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You cannot cite Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia, please remove them to help cut down the (frankly ridiculous levels of) WP:REFBOMBING. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
| Moriyama Teshima Architects | |
|---|---|
| Practice information | |
| Founded | 1958 |
Moriyama Teshima Architects (MTA), previously Moriyama & Teshima Architects, is a Canadian architectural practice founded by Japanese-Canadian architect Raymond Moriyama and Ted Teshima. The firm has offices in Toronto and Ottawa, and have completed projects across North America, Europe, and Asia, with a portfolio focused on civic, educational, and cultural buildings.[1][2]
Moriyama Teshima Architects have received six Governor General's Medals in Architecture.[3]
- ^ Norm Masaji Ibuki (August 9, 2010). "Raymond Moriyama's Sakura Ball Speech". Retrieved March 6, 2024.
- ^ Penelope Green (September 18, 2023). "Raymond Moriyama, Designer of Humane Public Spaces, Dies at 93". Retrieved March 6, 2024.
- ^ Royal Architectural Institute of Canada (October 15, 2014). "Governor General's Medals in Architecture - Past Recipients". Retrieved March 6, 2024.