Draft:Nathan Carlin

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,336 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Nathan Carlin (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 12 days ago by TheSkipperToo (talk: D · +) · Last edited 0 seconds ago

Submission declined on 12 November 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 14 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 11 November 2024 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information. Declined by Bobby Cohn 14 days ago.

• Comment: Unfortunately, instead of trimming the references as suggested on the draft talk page, even more sources have been added to support statements that already had several sources. Please trim the citations. bonadea contributions talk 20:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: See talk page discussion about WP:REFBOMBING. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: References need to take the reader to a page where the statement can be verified, not just to the home page of a website.
  Instead of just using references to verify statements, you'll need to add references that show that Carlin's life and work has been written about by multiple reliable, independent publications. See WP:NPROF. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. Theroadislong (talk) 22:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: This is written as a CV. Write instead using summary style in the form that is suitable for an encyclopedia. Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Rev. Nathan Steven Carlin, PhD (born 1979) is a prolific scholar of medical humanities with an interest in psychoanalysis and religion.^[1][2] Dr. Carlin is the Samuel Karff Chair and a professor at the McGovern Medical School, University of Texas' Health Sciences Center (UTHealth Houston) where he directs the McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics.^[3][4] He teaches undergraduate and graduate medical students and dental students. His teaching interests include clinician writing, pathography, death and dying, and literature and medicine.

Carlin is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Medical Humanities.^[5] In 2018-2019, Carlin served as chair of the faculty senate of McGovern Medical School.

He is a Minister of the Word and Sacrament in the Presbyterian Church (USA).