 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,286 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 29 June 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 1 November 2023 by Timtrent (talk). I'm struggling with this draft. a huge lead section - something that is meant to summarise the article contents, but is most of the content - needs a précis or subdividing. That alone does not prevent acceptance.
Declined by Timtrent 11 months ago.Then we move to a set of numbered lists, instances of NICS. To me this makes the draft a WP:COATRACK. Surely the underlying articles should be the ones drafted? Do we need the summary? This feels part essay-like, and part similar to a college assignment. Is this part of an education project? Declining theist provoke thought on the real direction you wish this draft to take | |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Nature-inspired cybersecurity (NICS) is a distinct sector in computer security that derives defensive strategies from observations in nature, such as animal swarms and chaotic systems. It addresses a wide range of threats including data disclosure, repudiation, privilege escalation, compromise, service disruption, and redirection. NICS fundamentally extrapolates models from natural systems