| Submission rejected on 19 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by DoubleGrazing 2 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 September 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Greenman 2 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 15 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). Cites no new sources since the previous decline, therefore still no evidence of notability. Also, still inherently promotional. If this is submitted again without addressing these issues, the draft may be rejected outright without the option to resubmit. Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 14 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by DoubleGrazing 7 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 February 2024 by Star Mississippi (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Star Mississippi 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 26 January 2024 by Fade258 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Fade258 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 December 2023 by Aviram7 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Aviram7 9 months ago. | |
Comment: Resubmitted without any improvement. From that, and the number of previous declines, I can only conclude that better sources are not available and that the subject is therefore not notable enough to warrant inclusion in the encyclopaedia. To avoid further reviewer effort being expended on this draft, I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: See WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. The entire early life section, for example, is unsourced. Greenman (talk) 10:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Recommended reading for reviewers, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeru Yadav and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theflyerofspace/Archive Star Mississippi 21:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Churnalism and publicity material do not establish notability per WP:GNG. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Out of process re-draftification, but submitters and acccepters were socks (cc @Spicy:), so restoring the status quo ante. Any established editor is welcome to take action as they see fit if the subject now meets WP:BIO and the sourcing is acceptable Star Mississippi 01:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Probably meet the WP:GNG but as a politician it doesnot pass the politician criteria. Fade258 (talk) 10:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Restoring my note re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeru Yadav. Please stop removing it. Star Mississippi 14:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Does not appear to meet WP:NPOL but she may meet WP:GNG. Hitro talk 10:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Neeru Yadav | |
|---|---|
 Neeru Yadav at the Garbage Free Marriage Functions Campaign in 2022 | |
| Sarpanch | |
| Preceded by | Er Ashok Yadav, Sheetal Kansara[citation needed] |
| Constituency | Jhunjhunu |
| Personal details | |
| Born | 1989 or 1990 (age 34–35)[1] Rajasthan[citation needed] |
| Political party | BJP[2] |
| Residence | Rajasthan |
Neeru Yadav is an Indian social worker and sarpanch from Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.[3] She is known as Hockey Wali Sarpanch because of her contributions to hockey in her village.[4][5][6][7]
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
dribblewas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
empowermentwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "शादियों में होने वाले खाने की बर्बादी के खिलाफ छेड़ी मुहिम, जानें- कौन हैं 'हॉकी वाली सरपंच'". ABP News (in Hindi). 6 February 2023. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
- ^ "Neeru Yadav: जानें कौन हैं 'हॉकी वाली सरपंच', जिनके काम की अमिताभ बच्चन ने भी की तारीफ". Amar Ujala (in Hindi). Retrieved 25 January 2024.
- ^ "'Hockey Wali Sarpanch' inks pact with NABARD to strengthen farmers". Livemint. 7 January 2023. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
- ^ "नारी शक्ति की जीती जागती मिसाल हैं 'हॉकी वाली सरपंच' नीरू यादव, ऐसे संवार रहीं पंचायत का भविष्य | Neeru Yadav the 'Hockey wali Sarpanch' of Rajasthan". Rajasthan Patrika (in Hindi). 27 January 2023. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
- ^ "Rajasthan's Sarpanch initiates the 'Garbage Free Marriage Functions' Campaign|Neeru Yadav the 'Hockey wali Sarpanch' of Rajasthan". Asian News International (in Hindi). 6 February 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2023.