 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,782 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by Vrxces (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: Unfortunately I have to decline. This is a tricky one that I can be dealt with on two fronts. Firstly, the article's subject matter, the website, needs to demonstrate it's had external coverage from reliable secondary sources. The few websites that have commented on its reporting are not reliable (see WP:VG/S) and therefore there isn't enough here to substantiate general notability. Secondly, even if there is notability, the article is currently not neutral per WP:NPOV and reads like an argumentative essay contradicting things the website has reported on. Inaccurate as aspects of the site's reporting may be, an external source needs to identify and report on this contradiction to suggest its inaccurate reporting is notable or controversial. Otherwise it's undue editorialisation. Please reach out if you have any questions on my talk page. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
| Type of business | Privately Held |
|---|---|
Type of site | Video game journalism, Politics |
| Headquarters | |
| Created by | Brandon Orselli |
| Founder(s) | Brandon Orselli |
| Editor | Brandon Orselli |
| Key people | Brandon Orselli, Jonathan White |
| Industry | Video game industry, Anime industry, News industry |
| URL | nichegamer.com |
| Commercial | Yes |
| Registration | Optional |
| Launched | 2013 |
Niche Gamer is an American news website based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.[1] Their articles are mainly on video games from Japan, however they also make articles on politics and other forms of media and pop-culture from around the world.[2] Their political articles are usually heavily bias and misinformative.[3][4]
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.