This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Comment: There is zero indication of notability. The draft cites six sources of which two are obviously not intellectually independent of the subject (Building Supply DK and Nordstern); Dagensbyggeri fails the WP:CTRL+F test. Licitationen doesn't discuss the subject, and it doesn't explain how Nordstern is related to KPC BYG. Byensnetvaerk describes buildings and mentions that Norderstn is the building contractor, but that's it. Bold seems to be a sports-related source and doesn't discuss the subject at all. What do you expect? You must cite sources that discuss the subject in sufficient detail. If you don't improve the draft (and I can see that you have not done that since the last decline in March), it will still be declined in the future. The sources for that subject are sparse, and honestly, I am not sure whether notability can be established, but there is definitely room for improvement. Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Nordstern is a Danish property developer and turnkey contractor that develops, constructs, and renovates residential and commercial buildings throughout Denmark.[1]
Nordstern's largest business area is residential construction, with renovation constituting a growing share of the company's portfolio. Nordstern has been involved in projects such as Sluseholmen and Mjølnerparken in Copenhagen, as well as UNITY and Trælasten in Aarhus.
Nordstern is owned by the investment fund ActivumSG and was formed through the merger of CASA and KPC in 2022. The company´s history dates back to 1979.[2]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.