| Submission declined on 6 September 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 4 September 2024 by IntentionallyDense (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by IntentionallyDense 11 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 4 September 2024 by OhHaiMark (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by OhHaiMark 11 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 August 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 25 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 20 August 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by DoubleGrazing 26 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Utopes 34 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 August 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 34 days ago. | |
Comment: Please take the time to properly address previous concerns. Repeated submissions without doing so will just result in the submission being permanently rejected.For example, since the previous decline, a date of birth has been added (unsourced) and a new source added that doesn't even mention the subject. The early life section remains entirely unsourced.Please also see WP:COI. Greenman (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Previous decline still stands. If you keep submitting it without sourcing everything, it may be rejected. OhHaiMark (talk) 11:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Still does not meet minimum inline citation requirements. Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Almost completely unreferenced, therefore whatever claims of notability there may be, are unsupported, while the three sources cited don't come even close to establishing notability per WP:GNG. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Does not meet inline citation requirements. External links in the body of the article should be removed. The "Motivation" section is unwarranted, and especially so without any sources there. Utopes (talk / cont) 12:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The vast majority of the content here is unsourced and please note we don't use external links in the body of an article. Theroadislong (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)