| Submission declined on 2 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. | &sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg){kind=logo} |
| Submission declined on 18 March 2024 by User4edits (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by User4edits 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 17 March 2024 by User4edits (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by User4edits 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 17 March 2024 by User4edits (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by User4edits 6 months ago. | |
Comment: The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will require disambiguation if accepted.If this draft is accepted, a hatnote will need to be added to the primary page to refer to this page. If there is already a hatnote on the primary page, please review whether a disambiguation page is in order instead.The primary page is P. K. Narayana Pillai. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment:
See: Issues with Soruce Nair. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
&sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:Ambox_warning_pn.svg){kind=small}
- Comment: There is confusion between P. K. Narayana Pillai who lived 1879-1936 and this draft for P.K. Narayana Pillai who lived 1910-1990, especially as the listed Bibliography for the older person includes publications well after that person's death. David notMD (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Most of the references are self-published, such as "The Universal Light" (ref) where you have changed the author name from this individual to Nair, yet the cited chapter is "About Author". Please do not try to deceive. References with "my esteemed friend" are not independent. Further, you have put claims out of the blue like principal of such college, without any reference. Most of the references are not available to be cross- checked. The website you have cited [1] has no mention of Pillai. Lastly, someone by the same name, similar achievements, same domain, and even listed the same book in his works (The Universal Light) exists at: P. K. Narayana Pillai.You have a COI with the subject. Despite being a PhD, you are not able to demonstrate competence. Please understand. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 14:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: All sources are Self published or primary sources. Please see the message above, especially -- "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)". Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 18:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please cite proper sources, not indexes in WorldCat. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
&sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:Question_book-new.svg){kind=small}
Puthillathu Krishna Narayana Pillai was a literary critic and poet of Sanskrit and Malayalam literature,[1][2] As a poet, he was notable for writing mahākāvya, a genre of Indian epic poetry in Sanskrit, and translated important literary works by poets including Kerala Varma Valiya Koil Thampuran.