| Submission declined on 18 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 17 July 2024 by Bkissin (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Bkissin 2 months ago. | |
Comment: The sources mostly seem to be about the egg which we already have an article on. Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: @David notMD:, @Theroadislong: can either of you take a look at the sources I added and give me a sense on quality? I think developing the 1970s Alberta logo would be an additional point of notability, but I can't seem to verify that information. That, plus all the citation needed information (which is one of the few places that could be sourced from the obit) leaves it in progress/in limbo right now. Bkissin (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Needs editing for neutral tone and it's unclear how they pass WP:NARTIST? Theroadislong (talk) 05:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: First and foremost, needs more sources. Secondly, please clarify: what do you mean he's the author of the sculpture? Did he design it? Did he sculpt and build it himself?The whole article reads like a hagiography of Sembaliuk, with puffery and peacock words all over the article. There may be a case where the subject is notable, but the article needs more sources and rewrites before it is ready for the mainspace. Bkissin (talk) 20:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC):Answer from the author of the article: Thanks, some sources added. The texts explains Sembaliuk's relation to the sculpture "His most renowned project is the design and project management of the Vegreville Pysanka..."
- Comment: First and foremost, needs more sources. Secondly, please clarify: what do you mean he's the author of the sculpture? Did he design it? Did he sculpt and build it himself?The whole article reads like a hagiography of Sembaliuk, with puffery and peacock words all over the article. There may be a case where the subject is notable, but the article needs more sources and rewrites before it is ready for the mainspace. Bkissin (talk) 20:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC):Answer from the author of the article: Thanks, some sources added. The texts explains Sembaliuk's relation to the sculpture "His most renowned project is the design and project management of the Vegreville Pysanka..."
- Comment: First and foremost, needs more sources. Secondly, please clarify: what do you mean he's the author of the sculpture? Did he design it? Did he sculpt and build it himself?The whole article reads like a hagiography of Sembaliuk, with puffery and peacock words all over the article. There may be a case where the subject is notable, but the article needs more sources and rewrites before it is ready for the mainspace. Bkissin (talk) 20:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC):Answer from the author of the article: Thanks, some sources added. The texts explains Sembaliuk's relation to the sculpture "His most renowned project is the design and project management of the Vegreville Pysanka..."
- Comment: First and foremost, needs more sources. Secondly, please clarify: what do you mean he's the author of the sculpture? Did he design it? Did he sculpt and build it himself?The whole article reads like a hagiography of Sembaliuk, with puffery and peacock words all over the article. There may be a case where the subject is notable, but the article needs more sources and rewrites before it is ready for the mainspace. Bkissin (talk) 20:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC):Answer from the author of the article: Thanks, some sources added. The texts explains Sembaliuk's relation to the sculpture "His most renowned project is the design and project management of the Vegreville Pysanka..."
Paul Maxym Sembaliuk (July 2, 1929 – November 26, 2019) was a Canadian graphic artist best known for designing the Vegreville Pysanka, the world's largest sculpture of a Ukrainian-style Easter egg.